Signup
Welcome to... Canonfire! World of GreyhawK
Features
Postcards from the Flanaess
Adventures
in Greyhawk
Cities of
Oerth
Deadly
Denizens
Jason Zavoda Presents
The Gord Novels
Greyhawk Wiki
#greytalk
JOIN THE CHAT
ON DISCORD
    Canonfire :: View topic - Age old question?
    Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion
    Age old question?

    Are you a power gamer or role player?
    Power Gamer
    0%
     0%  [ 0 ]
    Roll Player
    100%
     100%  [ 22 ]
    Total Votes : 22

    Author Message
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Sep 14, 2009
    Posts: 171
    From: Laporte IN.

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:38 pm  
    Age old question?

    The question is this: are you a power gamer where stat's are the main goal,kills and max damage Evil ? Or is it all about role playing Happy ?

    Last edited by baronzemo on Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:50 pm; edited 3 times in total
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 10, 2003
    Posts: 1234
    From: New Jersey

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:46 pm  

    Baronzemo,

    I chose roll player assuming you meant role player.

    Later

    Argon
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Sep 14, 2009
    Posts: 171
    From: Laporte IN.

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:53 pm  

    You got to get with the times Argon, it's now a roll' play'a Smile. And yes, my grammar sucks!

    Last edited by baronzemo on Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:00 pm; edited 2 times in total
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:56 pm  

    Role player, hands' down. Power gamers are my anti-thesis. I attribute them to Forgotten Realms and middle schoolers. Sorry if I offend. Just my perspective is all.

    But that said, it doesn't mean that I don't like a good, ol' fashioned scrap where the ring of steel and flash of magic resound! Quite the opposite, actually, but I like characters come to life from pieces of paper.

    -Lanthorn, Camp of Argon
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 10, 2003
    Posts: 1234
    From: New Jersey

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:02 pm  

    Don't fret baronzemo you will learn. Many cannonfire members are good at correcting grammar. Where's the Mystic when you need him.

    Later

    Argon
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 24, 2003
    Posts: 174
    From: British Columbia, Canada

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:52 pm  

    I enjoy a fairly close balance between stats and role playing - the statistics are there to help guide my interpretation of the PC. LEt's face it - low Wisdom or Intelligence (or any other stat for that matter) directly affect how your PC tends to com across in a given situation.

    That said, if I had to pick between the two extremes in a choice of gaming groups, I'd take the role players every time. Power gaming can be fun, but it wears off fairly quickly in my experience.
    _________________
    <div>Braggi, Swain and Varlet at Large<br /></div>
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Mar 05, 2007
    Posts: 290
    From: The Pomarj

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:49 pm  



    Last edited by BlueWitch on Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:36 am; edited 1 time in total
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:55 pm  

    "I'll stop now, before I get on a roll."

    But do you prefer 'role?' Wink

    -Lanthorn
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 17, 2008
    Posts: 157
    From: Philadelphia, PA

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:01 pm  

    I checked the "Role Player" box, as well.

    Although, much like Lanthorn, I enjoy a good scrap, too.



    Though it needn't necessarily devolve into "hack n' slash", all good drama is driven by conflict of some sort or another.
    GreySage

    Joined: Jul 26, 2010
    Posts: 2695
    From: LG Dyvers

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:14 pm  

    With new/young players, I allow them to roll up characters and adjust them as they like to maximize their attributes. It's fun for them and having trumped up PCs allows me to play the monsters they encounter in a more deadly fashion, so I don't mind it at all.

    When I make up a character of my own nowadays, I try to give them an average attribute that would normally be their prime (eg. strength for a fighter) and give them a high attribute not normally associated with that class of character (eg. intelligence for a fighter). I develop a backstory to explain why the PC became a member of that class rather than one more appropriate to their stats, then I take as much advantage of the stats as I can.

    For example, I have the 11 strength, 17 intelligence fighter specialize with ranged weapons or weapons with reach to avoid being on the front line of combat. I have her use the high number of skill ranks from her intelligence to become the party's specialist in certain skill areas. When she's attained a certain level in fighter, I might have her start taking levels in another class, like bard.

    So, yes, I am min/maxing, but I do it in a way that is much more of a challenge than simply rolling up a fighter PC with an 18 strength, dexterity, and Constitution.

    There does have to be a good story, though, or the whole thing is boring. So, I love both the roll playing and the role playing equally, I think.

    SirXaris
    Black Hand of Oblivion

    Joined: Feb 16, 2003
    Posts: 3835
    From: So. Cal

    Send private message
    Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:18 pm  

    Where's the "Both" option? Happy

    By "both", I mean "Power gaming that is in character". You know, like...

    "Lightly I toss my hat away,
    Languidly over my arm let fall
    The cloak that covers my bright array-
    Then out swords, and to work withal!
    A Launcelot, in his Lady's hall...
    A Spartacus, at the Hippodrome!...
    I dally awhile with you, dear jackal,

    [Yes, I have been putting all +21 of my Combat Expertise + Improved Combat Expertise + Dodge in AC while I toy with you...but now it is time for Weapon Finesse + Power Attack + Weapon Focus + Weapon Specialization + Greater Weapon Focus + Greater Weapon Specialization + Improved Critical + Power Critical]
    Then, as I end the refrain, thrust home!"
    Evil Grin Razz
    _________________
    - Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 09, 2003
    Posts: 1358
    From: Tennessee, between Ft. Campbell & APSU

    Send private message
    Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:19 am  

    baronzemo wrote:
    The question is this: are you a power gamer where stat's are the main goal,kills and max damage Evil ? Or is it all about role playing Happy ?


    -Ah! The question that gets to heart of a few previous discussions!

    I haven't answered the poll, because I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Somewhere in here:

    Cebrion wrote:
    Where's the "Both" option? Happy

    By "both", I mean "Power gaming that is in character". You know, like...

    "Lightly I toss my hat away,
    Languidly over my arm let fall
    The cloak that covers my bright array-
    Then out swords, and to work withal!
    A Launcelot, in his Lady's hall...
    A Spartacus, at the Hippodrome!...
    I dally awhile with you, dear jackal,

    [Yes, I have been putting all +21 of my Combat Expertise + Improved Combat Expertise + Dodge in AC while I toy with you...but now it is time for Weapon Finesse + Power Attack + Weapon Focus + Weapon Specialization + Greater Weapon Focus + Greater Weapon Specialization + Improved Critical + Power Critical]
    Then, as I end the refrain, thrust home!"
    Evil Grin Razz


    ...is what I'm getting at.

    In what I like to call my "real life," I have ethical and moral motivations, emotions and eccentricities (role playing), but I've spent a good bit of effort into selecting "classes," improving my "stats," and collecting "skills" and "feats" which would make me more "powerful" (roll playing) in order to accomplish those goals.

    Put another way, any character, particularly an adventurer, would put a lot of effort into maximizing his abilities, since it's important to his life and limb, that of his friends, and to the success of whatever "cause" he might chose.

    Braggi wrote:
    I enjoy a fairly close balance between stats and role playing - the statistics are there to help guide my interpretation of the PC. LEt's face it - low Wisdom or Intelligence (or any other stat for that matter) directly affect how your PC tends to com across in a given situation...


    ...and...

    SirXaris wrote:
    ...For example, I have the 11 strength, 17 intelligence fighter specialize with ranged weapons or weapons with reach to avoid being on the front line of combat. I have her use the high number of skill ranks from her intelligence to become the party's specialist in certain skill areas. When she's attained a certain level in fighter, I might have her start taking levels in another class, like bard...


    -These, too. In D&D 3.5, an intelligent character can do a lot physically by putting skill points into "Climb", "Jump", "Swim", "Balance", "Tumble" etc.
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:38 am  

    I, too, like to put a lot of emphasis on skills. There are those who prefer the 'combat monster,' but not me. Sure, I like a character to kick some butt. I've got a few of those (my fighter/priest of Trithereon, Belisarius, is one; my namesake, "Lanthorn," a bladesinger, can surely hold his own, too), but they are not shallow on the skill set, either. I am constantly adding to or improving proficiencies as my characters advance in level. The aforementioned 'combat monster' is good for one thing and one thing ONLY. Killing. In the end, when all the enemies are dead, that character is totally useless for anything else. You've basically painted yourself into a corner.

    -Lanthorn
    GreySage

    Joined: Jul 26, 2010
    Posts: 2695
    From: LG Dyvers

    Send private message
    Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:23 pm  

    Cebrion wrote:
    "Lightly I toss my hat away,
    Languidly over my arm let fall
    The cloak that covers my bright array-
    Then out swords, and to work withal!
    A Launcelot, in his Lady's hall...
    A Spartacus, at the Hippodrome!...
    I dally awhile with you, dear jackal,

    [Yes, I have been putting all +21 of my Combat Expertise + Improved Combat Expertise + Dodge in AC while I toy with you...but now it is time for Weapon Finesse + Power Attack + Weapon Focus + Weapon Specialization + Greater Weapon Focus + Greater Weapon Specialization + Improved Critical + Power Critical]
    Then, as I end the refrain, thrust home!"
    Evil Grin Razz


    Nice Cyrano De Bergerac quote, Cebrion! Happy

    SirXaris
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: Feb 15, 2010
    Posts: 60


    Send private message
    Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:53 am  

    Many moons ago our crew played a 2e campaign and decided to min/max/power-game. It was fun for a few sessions, but it ultimately proved very fatal for most of our characters, and our DM was not in TPK mode. I think I cycled through 2 or 3 different characters in the span of 2.x adventures. There's just something about the "realism" of some lower stats to enhance the "fight or FLIGHT" response... it increases survivability.

    Groups I participated in had more fun when we didn't really sweat the numbers so much. Oh, but we didn't enforce "non-power" gaming either--if a character was crummy or amazingly average, we'd allow a re-roll. (I'm a champ at that btw. Can get all 9s and 10s every time)
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:25 am  

    Not even one power gamer lurking in our midst? Shocked Surely there is at least one hiding, cloaked as a role-player instead... Wink

    -Lanthorn
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 10, 2003
    Posts: 1234
    From: New Jersey

    Send private message
    Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:31 pm  

    Happy with the results so far. Like I said power gaming cannot sustain a long lasting campaign. It gets old fast, and takes away a lot of the fun of role-playing through many situations. Combat is good but feels like an accounting sessions when you hear do this with that weapon because it will deal x amount of damage a round. When weapon d is faster and lighter. Besides not every 8 character party can be dealt elven chain mail which fits.

    Later

    Argon
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 09, 2003
    Posts: 1358
    From: Tennessee, between Ft. Campbell & APSU

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:35 am  

    Lanthorn wrote:
    Not even one power gamer lurking in our midst? Shocked Surely there is at least one hiding, cloaked as a role-player instead... Wink

    -Lanthorn


    Well, I said i don't think that they are mutually exclusive...
    GreySage

    Joined: Oct 06, 2008
    Posts: 2788
    From: South-Central Pennsylvania

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:58 am  

    Lanthorn wrote:
    Not even one power gamer lurking in our midst?


    One, or two . . . certainly. But don't even try counting all the "Rules Lawyers" lurking in our midst! Laughing
    _________________
    Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
    Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Sep 14, 2009
    Posts: 171
    From: Laporte IN.

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:03 pm  

    That should be the next poll: Are you a Rules Lawyer or are you not Shocked
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 09, 2010
    Posts: 114


    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:10 pm  

    I'm a role-playing power gamer. I design my characters around both what I want their personalities to be like and how I want them to be effective in combat. I sometimes enjoy role-playing a BDF with low Int and Cha as that let's me, as a player, relax more during sessions--I leave the heavy thinking to the guys playing smart and charismatic PCs (otherwise, my tactical nature will quickly assert itself and my character will start taking charge during fights). So I agree with others that there needs to be a "both" option.

    Re: rules lawyer, guilty when it comes to 3.x. That's because, in Living Greyhawk, we kind of had to be to be effective DMs and Triad members, imo.

    aurdraco appropriately posting as Tiny


    Last edited by SC-Tiny on Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:04 am; edited 1 time in total
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Aug 17, 2004
    Posts: 924
    From: Computer Desk

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:26 pm  

    The real question: who will admit to powergaming?

    I have gamed with players that construct characters with mathematical precision few college courses achieve and grow irate with any interaction besides combat but still consider themselves role-players.
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:53 pm  

    baronzemo wrote:
    That should be the next poll: Are you a Rules Lawyer or are you not Shocked


    Tag, yer it, Baron!

    -Lanthorn, "Not It" (I've got enough queries as it is...but I will post my answer!)
    Adept Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 12, 2001
    Posts: 465
    From: Ithaca, New York

    Send private message
    Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:53 pm  

    Lanthorn wrote:
    Not even one power gamer lurking in our midst? Shocked Surely there is at least one hiding, cloaked as a role-player instead... Wink

    -Lanthorn

    Who would admit to it? The OP makes it clear there's a "right" answer and a "wrong" answer.
    Evil
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 01, 2007
    Posts: 699
    From: On a Cape on the East Coast

    Send private message
    Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:09 pm  
    Rules Paladin

    Well, I'll say this much ... I consider myself more of a role-player.

    But, I have been accused - on occasion - of not being so much a Rules Lawyer, as a Rules Paladin.
    _________________
    Owner and Lead Admin: https://greyhawkonline.com<div>Editor-in-Chief of the Oerth Journal: https://greyhawkonline.com/oerthjournal</div><div>Visit my professional art gallery: https://wkristophnolen.daportfolio.com</div>
    GreySage

    Joined: Sep 09, 2009
    Posts: 2470
    From: SW WA state (Highvale)

    Send private message
    Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:27 pm  
    Re: Rules Paladin

    Icarus wrote:
    Well, I'll say this much ... I consider myself more of a role-player.

    But, I have been accused - on occasion - of not being so much a Rules Lawyer, as a Rules Paladin.


    -of Pholtus??? Wink

    -Lanthorn
    GreySage

    Joined: Oct 06, 2008
    Posts: 2788
    From: South-Central Pennsylvania

    Send private message
    Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:59 pm  
    Re: Rules Paladin

    Icarus wrote:
    Well, I'll say this much ... I consider myself more of a role-player.

    But, I have been accused - on occasion - of not being so much a Rules Lawyer, as a Rules Paladin.


    Lanthorn wrote:
    -of Pholtus???



    Jihad!


    Shocked Evil Grin
    _________________
    Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
    Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 07, 2004
    Posts: 1846
    From: Mt. Smolderac

    Send private message
    Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:33 pm  

    The one comment I will make on this. I've got one player in my campaign who doesn't care for role-playing. She's got an acting background but HATES improvisation, which role-playing pretty much requires. Her enjoyment of the game comes primarily from kicking the crap out of monsters. That said, she's never been a problem. Doesn't care about making her character into some hell-on-wheels unstopable monster. Never bugs me about wanting more magic or anything. Loves the background I made up for her character because it fits with how she views her, even though she doesn't really riff on it. Would I love for her to get into role-playing more than she does? Sure, but if she's enjoying the game and not causing any problems, I'm happy. I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's not necessarily an "either or" thing.
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Jul 09, 2003
    Posts: 1358
    From: Tennessee, between Ft. Campbell & APSU

    Send private message
    Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:28 pm  

    Ah! This might be a better place for this:

    "Role-Playing and Playing Roles: The Person, Player, and Persona in Fantasy Role-Playing"

    http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1525/si.2004.27.3.333.pdf?acceptTC=true

    (The link seems to work)

    I found this in JSTOR. It deals with the psychological/sociological implications of role-playing, particularly D&D. In true academic style, it has a lot of "studies of previous other studies" talk, which they call (I'm not kidding) "ethnographies."

    Some parts you can skim over.

    It's heavy on exploring "role-playing" as opposed to "roll-playing"; they actually mention min-maxing.

    I'm not sure that one of the groups they describe (the one DMed by the guy in the McDonald's uniform) is that typical. Up until now, I've always gamed with friends, with a few friends of friends thrown in, not complete strangers. I think Nerdcav's recent issue of dealing with the oddity of bringing a complete stranger into the group confirms my experience as more typical than the group they focus on.

    A lot of the observations are interesting because they point out things so obvious that we take it for granted (the difference between "you" and "you"). But they never really discuss the possibility of players getting emotionally involved in their characters.

    Check out note #3 on Gamemasters as a god... Evil Grin

    Oh yeah, AD&D came out in 1979, not 1989. Maybe a typo.

    It looks to me like someone found an excuse to turn D&D into a research project. Weasles. Razz
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 07, 2004
    Posts: 1846
    From: Mt. Smolderac

    Send private message
    Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:50 pm  

    Good find, James. I'll check it out.
    Display posts from previous:   
       Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
    Page 1 of 1

    Jump to:  

    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum




    Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

    Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!


    Greyhawk Gothic Font by Darlene Pekul is used under the Creative Commons License.

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.39 Seconds