Signup
Welcome to... Canonfire! World of GreyhawK
Features
Postcards from the Flanaess
Adventures
in Greyhawk
Cities of
Oerth
Deadly
Denizens
Jason Zavoda Presents
The Gord Novels
Greyhawk Wiki
#greytalk
JOIN THE CHAT
ON DISCORD
    Canonfire :: View topic - Noble Ranks in Furyondy
    Canonfire Forum Index -> Readers Workshop
    Noble Ranks in Furyondy
    Author Message
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Aug 11, 2001
    Posts: 635


    Send private message
    Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:27 am  
    Noble Ranks in Furyondy

    Interesting. The only point I have any real objection to is:

    Quote:
    First in order of precedence was the Viceroy, appointed by the Overking of the Great Kingdom in Rauxes. While the Viceroyalty eventually grew into a hereditary title, it never lost its character as an administrative post. The Viceroy of Ferrond ranked in the Rolls of Precedence of the Great Kingdom just under a baron and this only because the Viceroy was the Overking’s chief servant in the West.


    I'd argue that the viceroys had significantly higher rank than that - see the power wielded by the Viceroy of Ferrond's counterparts in Nyrond, and the North and South Privinces. You don't need to relegate the viceroys to lowly rank to get the hodge-podge of ranks in Furyondy - all you need is a relatively weak viceroy/king with very strong and independent nobles (weak and strong here being in terms of land, wealth, manpower etc). Ornery barons were the bane of French and English kings in the Middle Ages.
    CF Admin

    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 178
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:15 am  

    I'd argue that the Artur/Belvor civil war is bad reading of canon, but then thats me.

    I'd like to see less of a take of Furyondy outside of a homebrew GH campaign and see something more open for general use for a Furyondy article.
    _________________
    Canonfire Community Supporter and Forum Justicar
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Aug 05, 2004
    Posts: 1446


    Send private message
    Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:31 am  

    Dethand wrote:
    I'd argue that the Artur/Belvor civil war is bad reading of canon, but then thats me.

    I'd like to see less of a take of Furyondy outside of a homebrew GH campaign and see something more open for general use for a Furyondy article.


    Please note, the Furyondian Civil War is my invention and not canon. I have not and do not make any claim it is canon. By canon, Belvor continues to rule without opposition, let alone civil war. The Furyondian Civil War is the vehicle I created to attempt to rectify what I see as the mess Furyondy was left in in canon. My apologies for any confusion.
    _________________
    GVD
    Display posts from previous:   
       Canonfire Forum Index -> Readers Workshop All times are GMT - 8 Hours
    Page 1 of 1

    Jump to:  

    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum




    Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

    Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!


    Greyhawk Gothic Font by Darlene Pekul is used under the Creative Commons License.

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.35 Seconds