Signup
Welcome to... Canonfire! World of GreyhawK
Features
Postcards from the Flanaess
Adventures
in Greyhawk
Cities of
Oerth
Deadly
Denizens
Jason Zavoda Presents
The Gord Novels
Greyhawk Wiki
#greytalk
JOIN THE CHAT
ON DISCORD
    Canonfire :: View topic - What is the offical word From WOTC on Greyhawk?
    Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion
    What is the offical word From WOTC on Greyhawk?
    Author Message
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: May 30, 2007
    Posts: 27


    Send private message
    Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:41 am  
    What is the offical word From WOTC on Greyhawk?

    Is it a dead campagin world or will we be seeing more product during 4th ed and beyond?
    _________________
    What the hell is an aluminum falcon? (robot chicken star wars special
    Forum Moderator

    Joined: Feb 26, 2004
    Posts: 2590
    From: Ullinois

    Send private message
    Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:24 am  

    A. I am fairly sure there is no official word. I think they've become adept at skirting that issue in truth.

    B. Greyhawk is regularly mined for 4th edition conversions. So anyone wishing to run GH moving forward with WotC is quite able to. Afterall, the setting fluff in the 83 Guide (1st edition), From the Ashes (2nd edition) and the LGG (3rd) are all quite compatible with any edition due to their loose inclusion of game rules. For those who have to have new feats, classes, powers, etc all wrapped up in a setting book, well....

    C. The door is always going to be open for a 4th edition GH Setting release. They did Dark Sun last and this August I fully expect their next setting conversion to be announced. The Vegas odds still aren't good for the ol Flanaess this year, but it WILL come around eventually. WotC's reluctance to let Greyhawk IP rest is a clear sign it's still in the loop. And when it does go back into production (Don't expect more than 3 books) it will already have had a few years headstart in development through Wizard's eDungeon and eDragon mags.

    In my opinion, GH needs the cool down time before it is officially thrust back on the scene. Not sure why, but it feels right.

    p.s. Don't expect Paizo to ever try to get a license on Greyhawk development again(This I recall reading from a Lisa Stevens post). Their highly successful Pathfinder campaign now gives them the luxury of never having to kowtow to WotC again.
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: May 30, 2007
    Posts: 27


    Send private message
    Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:34 pm  

    Thanks for the info, I really wish Wotc would publish some of the old modules again in thier original format, (like they did in the silver anniversery set) I for one would love to see T1-4 and City of Skulls reprinted
    _________________
    What the hell is an aluminum falcon? (robot chicken star wars special
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Sep 14, 2009
    Posts: 171
    From: Laporte IN.

    Send private message
    Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:00 pm  

    I would love to see Wotc reprint some of the old modules. But it would be some time before they put out the gold edtion. By that time Wotc will be putting out 9th edtion. Confused
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 07, 2004
    Posts: 1846
    From: Mt. Smolderac

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:32 am  

    I suspect that's what we'll end up getting, setting neutral conversions of classic modules. Kind of like what they did with Village of Hommlet. From a marketing standpoint GH is too much like the "core setting "for it to be a hot-selling item, so I don't think WoTC will ever put out a setting book or anything like that. But ever is a long time, and that's just my opinion.
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Sep 12, 2005
    Posts: 266


    Send private message
    Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:30 am  

    In the meantime, we have Tomb of Horrors out this summer which, while it will be setting neutral or more correctly be set in the PoL core setting, will undoubtedly have some GH goodness in it.

    Can't see how it could be a super module as it is billed and anywhere like faithful to the original (and there is no promise that it will be) without referring to some of the area around the tomb and the backstory that has been developed over the last three editions. Here's hoping at any rate Happy
    Forum Moderator

    Joined: Feb 26, 2004
    Posts: 2590
    From: Ullinois

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:20 am  

    Ah yes Village of Hommlet and Tomb of Horrors, I forgot about those. This further shows how GH is kept in the D&D-loop. WotC knows just on name recognition alone that GH material will sell. We could very well have several more retrofitted GH adventures like this for 4e before an actual campaign book. The rehash trend is not new either. TSR was doing with their Return to- series well before WotC started their Expedition to- stuff in late 3rd edition.

    The ToH one especially intrigues me because on one hand you have the well-known lethality of the original ToH and now you have a new ToH for a 4e system where dying is intentionally made more difficult. Which wins out? Is a good balance made? Is it possible to make a death-trap dungeon anymore or will it just be a standard dungeon with balanced encounters and the ToH name slapped on the cover to draw more interest? I will certainly be looking for this one at Gencon. Thanks for the reminder.
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: May 30, 2007
    Posts: 27


    Send private message
    Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:39 am  

    New TOH omg thats gonna suck, does anyone remember the pile of drek they tried to pass off as return to the tomb of horrors or the other 3rd ed abortions they tried to sell us as first ed retrofits. Omg please just rerelease the originals and quit trying to improve on perfection. At the risk of sounding like the old dude yelling at kids to get out of his yard, Ad&d was so much better in the 70's and 80's ever since then they have tried and tried to make it easier to play and understand for everyone and in doing so have issued a watered down product that bears no relation to the originals. I mean for god's sake killing a dragon in a game used to be a big deal now you can take em on at 3rd level WTH. Somewhere Gygax is rolling in his grave and may Vecna curse who ever is in charge of the brand at Wotc now. Ok rant over now
    _________________
    What the hell is an aluminum falcon? (robot chicken star wars special
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 17, 2004
    Posts: 52
    From: Wales

    Send private message
    Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:55 am  

    well considering the 'job' that was done on the Realms for 4th edition, I have been fervently hoping that they don't come within a golden mile of the setting.

    Sure I like new information on my favourite setting, but I have to say that the best fan-based material, as well as limited releases from some of its original designers (Gygax, Kuntz etc.) have been more than enough to keep the fires burning.

    The last few releases have not taken the campaign in any real direction (post FTA) IMO, and has tended to retread old ground with yet another glossography. What I would like is something wholly more imaginative..... campaign materials for a Baklunish or Suloise setting, Sea of Dust adventure giude or campaign etc. In other words something which brings something new to the table, not just a reheat.

    Sure I accept that for the players new to the setting they need something to get started, but in published for Greyhawk has often seemed just another missed opportunity.
    GreySage

    Joined: Aug 03, 2001
    Posts: 3310
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:01 am  

    lorekeeper wrote:
    New TOH omg thats gonna suck, does anyone remember the pile of drek they tried to pass off as return to the tomb of horrors or the other 3rd ed abortions


    Return to the Tomb of Horrors was second edition, actually, and it was pretty awesome.
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: May 12, 2005
    Posts: 933
    From: Woonsocket, RI, USA

    Send private message
    Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:17 am  

    rasgon wrote:
    lorekeeper wrote:
    New TOH omg thats gonna suck, does anyone remember the pile of drek they tried to pass off as return to the tomb of horrors or the other 3rd ed abortions


    Return to the Tomb of Horrors was second edition, actually, and it was pretty awesome.

    Yup... and as much of a 1E grognard as I am, dragons actually got tougher in subsequent editions, not easier.
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: Feb 07, 2007
    Posts: 64
    From: The Kingdom of Nyrond (LA County, CA)

    Send private message
    Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:08 am  

    I think he probably meant Return to the Temple of Elemental Evil, which by all accounts was pretty dire. :)
    Black Hand of Oblivion

    Joined: Feb 16, 2003
    Posts: 3835
    From: So. Cal

    Send private message
    Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:45 pm  

    Yeah, I was really looking forward to RttToEE, got it, opened it up, and thought "WTF were they thinking?!" Plain horrible book that goes off on a tangent into the 4th dimension. And I LIKE Tharizdun. ToEE does not = Mr. T though(nor does Mr. T = EEG). Just plain bad.

    RttToH was fine by me. The cult springing up around the tomb was not a bad idea at all. Acererak's name has been made to carry some weight, so there being somebody actually interested in him would be no surprise. Besides, adding some background to what is, in effect, a tomb that is a series of death traps, can't but help the place be something other than a deadly amusement park ride for adventurers.

    Don't forget to bring your 10' pole, or that kobold tied to the end of a 50' rope. Wink
    _________________
    - Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -


    Last edited by Cebrion on Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:54 am; edited 1 time in total
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 951
    From: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

    Send private message
    Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:26 pm  

    On a related note, for the sake of those of us who refuse to give WOTC another red cent...

    Has there been any GH content in Dungeon or Dragon since WotC took it over (other than the few things prior to 4e)? If so, is it "real" GH or just ideas mined thrown in with a bunch of new, non-setting-specific stuff?
    GreySage

    Joined: Aug 03, 2001
    Posts: 3310
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:32 am  

    bubbagump wrote:
    Has there been any GH content in Dungeon or Dragon since WotC took it over (other than the few things prior to 4e)?


    I suppose so. Kas appeared (in person) in Dragon #378 and Dungeon #170. The Demonomicon of Iggwilv got a mention in Dungeon #156 and the ongoing series of articles on demon lords. Not "real" Greyhawk, though. Nothing actually set on Oerth.
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Mar 04, 2003
    Posts: 156
    From: Nyrond

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:54 am  

    So far I've been pretty severely disappointed by WotC re-releases of classic scenarios. The Village of Hommlet was especially bad, failing utterly to keep any of the flavor text that made is a classic in the first place.

    What I'd love to see is the classics re-released with all the flavor still untouched but with the edition mechanics updated so they can be easily played in the new editions. It seems that it would be easier for WotC as well - cut and paste and swap out stat blocks. Change a few traps and monsters around where they nolonger fit. Still I suppose one of the reason that they do do the entire rewrite is probably some copywrite issue.

    At the same time copywrite issues probably prevent fans (like us here) from doing the conversions ourselves and posting them for others to use.
    Forum Moderator

    Joined: Feb 26, 2004
    Posts: 2590
    From: Ullinois

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:58 pm  

    Quote:
    It seems that it would be easier for WotC as well - cut and paste and swap out stat blocks. Change a few traps and monsters around where they nolonger fit. Still I suppose one of the reason that they do do the entire rewrite is probably some copywrite issue.

    But if they own Greyhawk lock stock and barrel, there should be no issue at all.
    Quote:
    At the same time copywrite issues probably prevent fans (like us here) from doing the conversions ourselves and posting them for others to use.

    Y'know, I forgot about that. Is that true? What did they ever decide about fansites for 4e? Could we do 4e Greyhawk conversions here if we wanted? (AFAIK nobody at CF has mentioned a strong desire to submit 4e material, though it is not discouraged.) Is there any major fansites out there doing conversions? Just curious.
    Journeyman Greytalker

    Joined: Mar 04, 2003
    Posts: 156
    From: Nyrond

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:10 pm  

    I was thinking that the WotC copywrite issue might be with the author/WotC agreements. I'd was thinking that if they rereleased a module and only changed the statblocks rather than doing a complete overhaul they may end up owing royalties to the original author depending on how the older writing agreements were worded.

    I would love to see a section here on Canonfire or another popular fan site where people who have done an edition conversion could post what they did for other people to use. Organized somehow so you could find the scenario/edition you were looking for if its already been done. I think we could get away with it even with copywrite if it was just mechanical changes (for example: in room 412 use four orc warriors [statblock] and a ogre brute [statblock] and the trap in the chest is [statblock]). Provided that copywrited text wasn't posted would it create a problem?
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 951
    From: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

    Send private message
    Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:59 pm  

    As I recall, WotC has full rights to use/reuse/fold/spindle/mutilate anything they want with Greyhawk and its past products. Gygax, et al only came away from their ouster with the rights to use such names as Zagyg and a few others, but had no actual rights beyond that. For example, if you recall, in one of the Gord novels Gygax used the name Zagyg, but had to change St. Cuthbert to St. Trowbane - he had the right to use one, but not the other.

    So yes, if they really wanted to WotC could release the old stuff (most of it, at least) with the old text and new stat blocks. However, they have in mind the re-packaging and re-imagining of D&D as a whole, since they want to take the game away from "geeks and hardcore hobbyists" like us and give it instead to the mainstream. That plan doesn't gibe well with releasing things that will appeal to us old-timers.

    Edit: And concerning the conversion of their old stuff, as I understand it (and my information is slightly old in this case) you can only post select things to a fansite, and anything relating to 4e or any of WotC's other IP becomes technically their property. Of course, they're not bloodly likely to take your stuff or even look at your site, but the clauses in the LA are still there in case WotC decides they want to flex their muscles. I wouldn't worry too much, though - I mean, after all, this site has been around for a decade or so and nobody at WotC has yet said or done anything...
    GreySage

    Joined: Aug 03, 2001
    Posts: 3310
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:29 am  

    He actually couldn't use the name Zagyg. The Mad Archmage was referred to in the later Gord books as Gargantua.
    CF Admin

    Joined: Oct 14, 2003
    Posts: 586
    From: Rel Astra

    Send private message
    Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:41 pm  

    Yeoman wrote:
    I have been fervently hoping that they don't come within a golden mile of the setting.


    LOL, my sentiments exactly!
    _________________
    Kneel before me, or you shall be KNELT!
    Forum Moderator

    Joined: Feb 26, 2004
    Posts: 2590
    From: Ullinois

    Send private message
    Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:22 pm  

    rasgon wrote:
    He actually couldn't use the name Zagyg. The Mad Archmage was referred to in the later Gord books as Gargantua.


    Gargantua? Eeesh! That must've been some Gygax ego-stroking there. I'd much prefer if he had devised a new anagram. Like, Axygg or something.
    GreySage

    Joined: Aug 03, 2001
    Posts: 3310
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:39 pm  

    I think it's actually a pretty complex wordplay based on a reference to a line in an Edgar Allan Poe story, "Hop-Frog."

    "He had an especial admiration for breadth in a jest, and would often put up with length, for the sake of it. Over-niceties wearied him. He would have preferred Rabelais' "Gargantua" to the "Zadig" of Voltaire: and, on the whole, practical jokes suited his taste far better than verbal ones."
    GreySage

    Joined: Aug 03, 2001
    Posts: 3310
    From: Michigan

    Send private message
    Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:26 am  

    Although OJ 12 says it's Gigantos, not Gargantua, so my Poe explanation might be wrong.Dance of Demons and Come Endless Darkness call him the Archimage or the Mad One of Magic.
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: May 12, 2005
    Posts: 933
    From: Woonsocket, RI, USA

    Send private message
    Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:15 am  

    The issue may have been unresolved at the time of the Gord novels, but Gary's later settlement with WOTC reaffirmed his right to anagrams (and near-anagrams) of his own name -- hence Castle Zagyg.
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 951
    From: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

    Send private message
    Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:00 pm  

    I should like to point out that this entire thread has continued for over 10 days without a single snarky comment from me concerning 4e, WotC, or the way Gygax got screwed by TSR.

    You may all congratulate me for my self control.
    GreySage

    Joined: Oct 06, 2008
    Posts: 2788
    From: South-Central Pennsylvania

    Send private message
    Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:14 pm  

    bubbagump wrote:
    You may all congratulate me for my self control.


    Man! That fact went completely unnoticed by me! Shocked

    I applaude your obviously abundant self-control! Wooo-hooo! Wink

    And thank you for not getting me started on the subject. Evil Grin
    _________________
    Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
    Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/


    Last edited by Mystic-Scholar on Sat May 01, 2010 11:39 am; edited 1 time in total
    Apprentice Greytalker

    Joined: Apr 08, 2008
    Posts: 116
    From: Australia

    Send private message
    Sat May 01, 2010 6:21 am  

    ditto. With qualifications.

    Cool

    Damien.
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 07, 2004
    Posts: 1846
    From: Mt. Smolderac

    Send private message
    Sat May 01, 2010 7:35 pm  

    So I'm guessing you all wouldn't like to hear about the "Navigating Suderham" skill challenge in the 4e DMG2? Smile
    Master Greytalker

    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 951
    From: Neck Deep in the Viscounty of Verbobonc

    Send private message
    Sun May 02, 2010 5:59 am  

    smillan_31 wrote:
    So I'm guessing you all wouldn't like to hear about the "Navigating Suderham" skill challenge in the 4e DMG2? Smile


    By all means, discuss said skill challenge at will! I'll just go make myself busy over there...

    (*Bubbagump pads away to work on his new manuscript "1,001 Ways to Skewer a Scholar"*)
    GreySage

    Joined: Oct 06, 2008
    Posts: 2788
    From: South-Central Pennsylvania

    Send private message
    Sun May 02, 2010 10:23 am  

    *Hmmm. I could have sworn there were only 999 ways to do it, but . . . I've been wrong before.*

    Never underestimate a Hairfoot halfling in Swedish leotards. Especially if they happen to be an assassin of Tharizdun! Evil Grin
    _________________
    Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
    Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
    Grandmaster Greytalker

    Joined: Nov 07, 2004
    Posts: 1846
    From: Mt. Smolderac

    Send private message
    Sun May 02, 2010 8:04 pm  

    bubbagump wrote:
    smillan_31 wrote:
    So I'm guessing you all wouldn't like to hear about the "Navigating Suderham" skill challenge in the 4e DMG2? Smile


    By all means, discuss said skill challenge at will! I'll just go make myself busy over there...

    (*Bubbagump pads away to work on his new manuscript "1,001 Ways to Skewer a Scholar"*)


    That's fine, I think my Yeshir hounds need feeding.
    GreySage

    Joined: Oct 06, 2008
    Posts: 2788
    From: South-Central Pennsylvania

    Send private message
    Mon May 03, 2010 7:46 am  

    So, I've got a half crazed assassin of Tharizdun on the one side of me and Smillian's yeshir hounds on the other side of me. Evil Grin

    I'll have to summon a couple of elementals I suppose. Razz
    _________________
    Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
    Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
    Display posts from previous:   
       Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
    Page 1 of 1

    Jump to:  

    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum




    Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

    Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!


    Greyhawk Gothic Font by Darlene Pekul is used under the Creative Commons License.

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.45 Seconds