Canonfire!

Mon Jul 23, 2007 11:38 am You! Yes, you. What do you want on Canonfire?

Looking at the forums, I see lots of reads to various threads. Sometimes hundreds and hundreds have read a particular thread. On the front page, where new articles show up, an article will usually get anywhere from 100 to 400 reads.

This tells me Canonfire has at least an active readership of anywhere from 100 to 400 people.

Now. Count how many different people have submitted an article in the last year. Far fewer.

Sure some people have no interest or time to write and submit an article. Others may be nervous for one reason or another.

Maybe it would help if people knew what other people are looking to see in an article submission? It might give some people an idea to write something. It might encourage someone who wants to write on that topic but has been nervous about it.

So. What do you want to see? What would turn your crack, so to speak?

A community is only as strong as its participation. Lurking is fine. But if everyone lurked . . . well . . . you get the idea.

So come on. Not asking you to write anything here. Asking what you might like to see written.

So? You have the floor. Say on!
_________________
GVD

Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:00 pm

Being relatively new to this site, I haven't yet checked out everything available here. That said, I apologize if my suggestions are redundant.

Seeing how your current poll is about the WGR series, which I was a big fan of most of that series, I'd like to see more articles/modules based on adventure seeds from those sourcebooks. Particularly Iuz the Evil, The Marklands and Ivid the Undying. As a longtime DM and player, I found these books really did a good job of expanding GH from 1st ed. and are loaded with great ideas. I've seen some of them developed for 3.5 (most recently an excellent epic level dungeon of Darnakurian's Doom in OJ#22) and I have developed some for my own campaigns, but there are literally hundreds more I'd like to see done. I plan on submitting some of my own in the future, but it would be cool to see some fellow Greyhawkers' versions realized.

Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:00 pm

As far as content is concerned, I don't think anything needs to be changed. This is already the best place on the web to go for new Greyhawk material (except, perhaps of the Oerth Journal site ;-)).

Nonetheless, I think CF! could benefit from a slight reorganization. It's not so easy to search for articles here. I'm no programmer so I wouldn't dare to suggest how such a thing could be done, but I have to admit I get a little frustrated sometimes searching through the tons of writing here.

Also, I think it might be a good idea to make the invitation to submit a bit more obvious. I didn't even know it was possible to submit articles to this site until I'd already ghosted here for some time. The little "submit article" link at the top left of the screen could be turned into something a bit more obvious. Also, I think it would be help to supply prospective writers a bit more information describing what a "good" submission might look like.

Other than that, keep up the good work. Long Live Greyhawk!

Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:06 pm

wow, good idea bubba. i'll get on it.
_________________
Kneel before me, or you shall be KNELT!

Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:12 pm

Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:30 pm

Im new around these parts and not wholly sure what sort of articles need writing. As an aspiring author I would definitelyly like to submit something. What about having a standing article pool. A list of articles (submitted by users or moderators) that those of us without direction can go to. sign up to write that article. I wanted to do a write up on Incabulos but found rather definitive write up in the OJ and also found out that another member had one going. I definitely want to submit.

Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:43 am

Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:44 am

I haven't submitted anything mainly because the thought never occured to me. Also because all the articles here appear to be written by allumi of Greyhawk, who are referencing works which were created before I was born!

But, since the call is going to out for fresh works, I'll see if I could wrack my head and come up with something.

I have had an idea knock about my noodle, which basicly came from my desire to one day get a player to say "Sooooo.......we have to save the dragon from the princess?"

So maybe an article on menaces to the Flaness that need splatting? I could maybe write o a few, but would anyone read them?

Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:12 am

Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:40 am

Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:48 am

Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:30 pm

Mr. DavidBedlam, Please Click Here.
_________________
Kneel before me, or you shall be KNELT!

Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:52 pm

Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:45 pm

Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:11 pm

Hey as you can see i joined a while back when i had more free time on my hands. I submitted a few articles and have'nt really had much time since maybe my first two years to really submit anything since. I assure you that the staff seriously try to correct all gramatical errors. Heck I had made so many with one of my last submissions not only did Duicarthan take his time going over it I too sent him a revision because parts of the article where incoherent without the revisions. Nossin the Meek was that article and if you read it I'm sure you'll agree that it turned out all right.

Now let me bring to you another point addressed as far as criticism. I had submitted an article called the Elves of Oerth it is one of the most read articles to date . However I received some of the worst criticism there was for the article as well as some of the greatest praise for the same article. There were a few people that out right attempted to assault my writing and claimed it was unreadable. Yet there were those people who did not like my article but praise me for my version and the staff was quick to discouraged those whom posted derogatory remarks.

My favorite article as far as feedback is concerned and I don't even like elves. Ultimately write what you want too write about and don't let anyones opinion decide what you will and won't submit. The sites called cannonfire for a reason.

Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:09 am

Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:27 am

Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:55 am

Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:19 am

Thanks Abysslin for the link posted above which offers some great advice. Am inspired now to submit the campaign outline and background as soon as I can. The other stuff will take some time as most is handwritten and the parts that are typed were produced on an Atari ST (showing the age!!) and cannot be imported into my PC. I have pages on my own interpretation of the Duchy of Urnst, some on the Wild Coast and some on the Fruzti. Will start typing this up, bring it up to date and submit here.

As to the original question. I love all that Canonfire does and has done. This is a site where you can find something about anything you'd care to look for about our favourite setting. Keep up the good work and hope I can add something to it.

Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:13 pm

Three things need to happen to get me posting articles again:

1> CF must clearly and loudly remind people of the fact that it is limited and partial to no particular edition of D&D.

2> Article posting (after being submitted) needs to be handled in a more timely manner. Waiting months for an article to appear on the site just makes me want to post it on the forum or elsewhere where it can elicit conversation while still fresh in my mind.

3> Article comments need to be restored.
_________________
What would Raxivort do?<br />

Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:46 pm

I agree that comments should be restored. It gives the articles that blog feel so you don't have to toggle back and forth. How this site can't control the spam and 1000's of other content-comment sites can is a crying shame. Fortunately I think the powers that be are looking into it, but how soon?

Also the posting schedule seems to be picking up again which is a plus for all. And as for the editionless thing, its a format I myself favor when possible, but it's a personal author choice. The way I see it, the only way to cater your article to ALL readers is removing edition specifics, this is why fluff articles are the best way to go.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:28 pm

Outstanding responses, comments and thoughts! Smile

Me personally, I'm interested in everyone's GH and enjoy reading articles that deal with individual variations. I think this is one of the great services of CF - it allows a sharing of ideas! So let's see some articles! Happy

_________________
GVD

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:05 am

Just incase anyone wants to know, I'm finishing off my first ever article for the site and will submit it once I've proof read it.

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:53 am

Chat,

I appreciate your editionless desire, and I think that it makes sense that the text should not require use of one edition or the other. However, I do like it when someone includes a seperate stat block. Even if it is a older or new edition it helps in conversion. Your articles included.

Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:12 am

Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:08 am

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:31 pm

As I have explained elsewhere. Canonfire lost its primary article publisher (Dongul) Greyson. This left pretty much nobody around to publish articles except Gary, when he had time.

Since I have returned, we have been publishing twice per week, which is catching the dates on backlogged submissions up.

Wolfsire, you are now at 3rd in the list, but will most likely be published second depending on me getting a response back with a problem I am having with Greyseer's article. Which is ahead of yours.

Chatdemon can't complain as he has a Canonfire admin account and may publish articles too, if he so wishes. Unless I missed something in my absence.
_________________
Kneel before me, or you shall be KNELT!

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:37 pm

I should also mention that I am slowing down on the publishing process since the last few articles are short on reads, which I believe is being affected by the latest OJ release. Wink

_________________
Kneel before me, or you shall be KNELT!

Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:13 pm

Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:41 am

Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:03 am