Who Thinks we should just ignore Taiia and Toldoth? |
I disagree, they are quality additions to Greyhawk |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
I agree, as a group we can will them into dissolution |
|
90% |
[ 20 ] |
Um, we have to recognize them as canon, but their only temple is lost in the Black Ice |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 22 |
|
Author |
Message |
Master Greytalker
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Posts: 1077
From: Orlane, Gran March
Send private message
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:04 pm
New Gods
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Alright here they are the new gods and goddesses?!?!
|
|
|
Forum Moderator
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2592
From: Ullinois
Send private message
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:55 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Who is Taiia and Toldoth?
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA
Send private message
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:02 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
They're from Deities and Demigods (3rd Ed).
Taiia is an example of a monotheistic religion. Toldoth is the dark side of a dualistic religion (Elishar is the light side).
I think they CAN be worked into a campaign, but I do not think that they should be adopted as Canon. _________________ There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
|
|
|
CF Admin
Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Posts: 178
From: Michigan
Send private message
|
Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:09 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Tai'ia is the be all and end all of a monotheistic example given in the D&Dg and while good is not very GH. We have Pholtus already!
Toldoth and Elishar are both made for each other and while they have potential its hard to use in GH with so many similar gods..perhaps in a new place it would be good.
Dennari has potential as a mystery nature cult of Beory of Obad-hai. _________________ Canonfire Community Supporter and Forum Justicar
|
|
|
Grandmaster Greytalker
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
Posts: 1212
Send private message
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:21 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
12 in a pantheon is all I can count on my fingers, so that is all I am going to allow.
|
|
|
Adept Greytalker
Joined: May 14, 2002
Posts: 429
From: Renton WA
Send private message
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:23 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
how did you come up with the idea that they should be added to greyhawk... they are not even in the correct part of DDG for them to be considered Oerth canon...
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA
Send private message
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:57 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Quote: |
how did you come up with the idea that they should be added to greyhawk... they are not even in the correct part of DDG for them to be considered Oerth canon... |
That's probably my fault. I mentioned them in the Gran March Project, pretty much to exclude them from consideration. The DDG lists them in the back, as an option or example, without linking them to a campaign setting.
For the Gran March project, I wanted to be clear that we were not turning a spotlight on them. But if someone wanted to use them in their own Greyhawk (such as myself), I don't see why they couldn't. But I don't think they should be included in any Canonfire works, since they are not (and should not be) Canon. _________________ There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
|
|
|
Master Greytalker
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Posts: 1077
From: Orlane, Gran March
Send private message
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:16 am
Whoops
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
I didnt look Firepower and misunderstood. I still think we should will them into dissolution.
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA
Send private message
|
Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:38 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
For Canon purposes; definitely.
Which brings up Denarri. Example of a mystery cult in the back of the DDG, after Elishar and Toldoth. An earth-mother type, similiar to Beory IMO. What about Denarri? Canon-fy her or set phasers for "ignore"? _________________ There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
|
|
|
Grandmaster Greytalker
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Posts: 1446
Send private message
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:32 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
I'm the lone dissenting vote so far. I like all of these deities.
Taiia is a monotheistic deity whose doctrine "denies not only the potency but even the existence of other gods . . ." This is sharply different than any other GH deity, from Pholtus on down. What fun to place Taiian worship somewhere in the West and have adventuring parties, with their clerics reach X-land, where Taiia is worshipped! Taiia is different but IMO different is good.
I think I'd place Taiian worship in Zindia, IMC.
Elishar (god of light) and Toldoth (god of darkness) are a matched pair of dualist deities. Again, we see nothing like this in the Flanaess. The closest it comes are the brother deities Heironeous and Hextor but their dualism is more restrained by their portfolios and alignments, which tend to take prescedence over sheer dualism. Again, I'd place the worship of Elishar and Toldoth in the West and allow it to be discovered by PCs.
I think I'd place Elishar's and Toldoth's worship in Orcreich and the Khanates. Rather than have the Orc's of Orcreich worship Gruumsh, I'd have them worship Toldoth as a Sauron-like figure. IMC.
Dennari is Ehlonna with dwarves substitued for elves. She is a coalescent deity. This goes back to the discussion of some months back of syncretism and coalescence. Syncretism gets more play, perhaps, but I think coalescence is much more interesting.
Of the four deities, I could easily see placing Dennari's worship within the Flanaess.
IMO _________________ GVD
|
|
|
Black Hand of Oblivion
Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3837
From: So. Cal
Send private message
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:00 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Greyhawk really doesn't need any more deites.
I'd rather see more done with what is already there.
(Wow! This must be my shortest response ever! ) _________________ - Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
|
|
|
Forum Moderator
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2592
From: Ullinois
Send private message
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:55 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
In another far off land like GVD said, yeah I could swing with those deities. I mean, the Tuov and Olman have their own and we RARELY discuss them, so it would be unlikely that the Oerid, Suel, Flan gods are spread out beyond Oerik. More gods needed? Not really, but thats b/c there's already too many in a small area actually.
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 116
From: New York City
Send private message
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:38 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
More gods for GH? Are you kidding me? If there was a problem before, it was that there are far too many deities to keep straight - the last thing we need is new ones. I guess as far as homebrew games go, you could incorporate some of the new and eliminate some of the old; I know I've culled a few dozen intermediate and lesser gods from my campaign already. Let us never speak of Taiia and Toldoth again - or at least not until we've overused Jascar and Velnius.
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 147
From: Edmonton, Canada
Send private message
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:16 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Quote: |
More gods for GH? Are you kidding me? If there was a problem before, it was that there are far too many deities to keep straight - the last thing we need is new ones. |
I could agree more. And as an aside the last thing we need are gods the act like FR gods who are way too intrusive.
That is just a pet peeve of mine. _________________ "Its a dangerous business going out your front door." JRR Tolkien
Unless you are a Greyhawk Heretic.
|
|
|
|