Signup
Welcome to... Canonfire! World of GreyhawK
Features
Postcards from the Flanaess
Adventures
in Greyhawk
Cities of
Oerth
Deadly
Denizens
Jason Zavoda Presents
The Gord Novels
Greyhawk Wiki
Canonfire :: View topic - New Gods
Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion
New Gods

Who Thinks we should just ignore Taiia and Toldoth?
I disagree, they are quality additions to Greyhawk
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
I agree, as a group we can will them into dissolution
90%
 90%  [ 20 ]
Um, we have to recognize them as canon, but their only temple is lost in the Black Ice
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 22

Author Message
Master Greytalker

Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Posts: 1077
From: Orlane, Gran March

Send private message
Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:04 pm  
New Gods

Alright here they are the new gods and goddesses?!?!
Forum Moderator

Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2592
From: Ullinois

Send private message
Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:55 pm  

Who is Taiia and Toldoth?
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA

Send private message
Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:02 pm  

They're from Deities and Demigods (3rd Ed).

Taiia is an example of a monotheistic religion. Toldoth is the dark side of a dualistic religion (Elishar is the light side).

I think they CAN be worked into a campaign, but I do not think that they should be adopted as Canon.
_________________
There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
CF Admin

Joined: Aug 29, 2002
Posts: 178
From: Michigan

Send private message
Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:09 pm  

Tai'ia is the be all and end all of a monotheistic example given in the D&Dg and while good is not very GH. We have Pholtus already! Wink
Toldoth and Elishar are both made for each other and while they have potential its hard to use in GH with so many similar gods..perhaps in a new place it would be good.
Dennari has potential as a mystery nature cult of Beory of Obad-hai.
_________________
Canonfire Community Supporter and Forum Justicar
Grandmaster Greytalker

Joined: Nov 23, 2004
Posts: 1212


Send private message
Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:21 am  

12 in a pantheon is all I can count on my fingers, so that is all I am going to allow.
Adept Greytalker

Joined: May 14, 2002
Posts: 429
From: Renton WA

Send private message
Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:23 am  

how did you come up with the idea that they should be added to greyhawk... they are not even in the correct part of DDG for them to be considered Oerth canon...
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA

Send private message
Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:57 am  

Quote:
how did you come up with the idea that they should be added to greyhawk... they are not even in the correct part of DDG for them to be considered Oerth canon...


That's probably my fault. I mentioned them in the Gran March Project, pretty much to exclude them from consideration. The DDG lists them in the back, as an option or example, without linking them to a campaign setting.

For the Gran March project, I wanted to be clear that we were not turning a spotlight on them. But if someone wanted to use them in their own Greyhawk (such as myself), I don't see why they couldn't. But I don't think they should be included in any Canonfire works, since they are not (and should not be) Canon.
_________________
There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
Master Greytalker

Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Posts: 1077
From: Orlane, Gran March

Send private message
Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:16 am  
Whoops

I didnt look Firepower and misunderstood. I still think we should will them into dissolution.
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Feb 11, 2004
Posts: 131
From: Cypress, CA

Send private message
Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:38 am  

For Canon purposes; definitely.

Which brings up Denarri. Example of a mystery cult in the back of the DDG, after Elishar and Toldoth. An earth-mother type, similiar to Beory IMO. What about Denarri? Canon-fy her or set phasers for "ignore"?
_________________
There is no problem that cannot be resolved with the application of more firepower.
Grandmaster Greytalker

Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Posts: 1446


Send private message
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:32 am  

I'm the lone dissenting vote so far. I like all of these deities.

Taiia is a monotheistic deity whose doctrine "denies not only the potency but even the existence of other gods . . ." This is sharply different than any other GH deity, from Pholtus on down. What fun to place Taiian worship somewhere in the West and have adventuring parties, with their clerics reach X-land, where Taiia is worshipped! Taiia is different but IMO different is good.

I think I'd place Taiian worship in Zindia, IMC.

Elishar (god of light) and Toldoth (god of darkness) are a matched pair of dualist deities. Again, we see nothing like this in the Flanaess. The closest it comes are the brother deities Heironeous and Hextor but their dualism is more restrained by their portfolios and alignments, which tend to take prescedence over sheer dualism. Again, I'd place the worship of Elishar and Toldoth in the West and allow it to be discovered by PCs.

I think I'd place Elishar's and Toldoth's worship in Orcreich and the Khanates. Rather than have the Orc's of Orcreich worship Gruumsh, I'd have them worship Toldoth as a Sauron-like figure. IMC.

Dennari is Ehlonna with dwarves substitued for elves. She is a coalescent deity. This goes back to the discussion of some months back of syncretism and coalescence. Syncretism gets more play, perhaps, but I think coalescence is much more interesting.

Of the four deities, I could easily see placing Dennari's worship within the Flanaess.

IMO
_________________
GVD
Black Hand of Oblivion

Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3837
From: So. Cal

Send private message
Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:00 pm  

Greyhawk really doesn't need any more deites.

I'd rather see more done with what is already there.


(Wow! This must be my shortest response ever! Happy )
_________________
- Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
Forum Moderator

Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Posts: 2592
From: Ullinois

Send private message
Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:55 am  

In another far off land like GVD said, yeah I could swing with those deities. I mean, the Tuov and Olman have their own and we RARELY discuss them, so it would be unlikely that the Oerid, Suel, Flan gods are spread out beyond Oerik. More gods needed? Not really, but thats b/c there's already too many in a small area actually.
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 116
From: New York City

Send private message
Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:38 am  

More gods for GH? Are you kidding me? If there was a problem before, it was that there are far too many deities to keep straight - the last thing we need is new ones. I guess as far as homebrew games go, you could incorporate some of the new and eliminate some of the old; I know I've culled a few dozen intermediate and lesser gods from my campaign already. Let us never speak of Taiia and Toldoth again - or at least not until we've overused Jascar and Velnius. Cool
Apprentice Greytalker

Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 147
From: Edmonton, Canada

Send private message
Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:16 am  

Quote:
More gods for GH? Are you kidding me? If there was a problem before, it was that there are far too many deities to keep straight - the last thing we need is new ones.


I could agree more. And as an aside the last thing we need are gods the act like FR gods who are way too intrusive.
That is just a pet peeve of mine.
_________________
"Its a dangerous business going out your front door." JRR Tolkien
Unless you are a Greyhawk Heretic.
Display posts from previous:   
   Canonfire Forum Index -> World of Greyhawk Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Canonfire! is a production of the Thursday Group in assocation with GREYtalk and Canonfire! Enterprises

Contact the Webmaster.  Long Live Spidasa!


Greyhawk Gothic Font by Darlene Pekul is used under the Creative Commons License.

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.39 Seconds