Author |
Message |
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Oct 29, 2018
Posts: 117
From: Salt Lake
Send private message
|
Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:45 pm
Serfdom in Greyhawk?
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Does any of the kingdoms practice serfdom? That is, making slaves of the farmers and have them work the land for you. It's part of Feudalism. Granted there are freemen in the world of Oerth, but there also must be serfs, right?
|
|
|
Adept Greytalker
Joined: Apr 11, 2009
Posts: 386
From: New York City
Send private message
|
Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:26 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Yes. If I recall correctly the Great Kingdom, Furyondy, and Nyrond all practiced serfdom based on the Carl Sergeant supplements. I suspect this is pretty common in Oeridian lands in general, so the smaller Oeridian states probably do as well. Of course, post Greyhawk Wars, this might changes, much in the way the Black Death increased the value of labor, giving serfs more negotiating power.
|
|
|
Black Hand of Oblivion
Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3837
From: So. Cal
Send private message
|
Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:54 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Yes, most of them. Some are less beneficent than others, and of those some are that way by design and others by necessity. Greyhawk is not a world of democracies, republics, or constitutional monarchies, but one of predominantly feudal monarchies and theocracies. And there are tyrants. Lots of tyrants. The Yeomanry is the most obvious exception, being a nation of freemen. _________________ - Moderator/Admin (in some areas)/Member -
Last edited by Cebrion on Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Oct 29, 2018
Posts: 117
From: Salt Lake
Send private message
|
Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:48 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Thank you for your timely response. That was pretty much what I was looking for.
|
|
|
Adept Greytalker
Joined: Apr 11, 2009
Posts: 386
From: New York City
Send private message
|
Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:24 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
I'd also recommend reading Tuchmann's A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century. It gives an overview of peasant life, specifically in France at the time, with its ups-and-downs. Also, Tuchmann is a fantastic author, and her work is very readable.
|
|
|
Adept Greytalker
Joined: Apr 11, 2009
Posts: 386
From: New York City
Send private message
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 7:36 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
On review for another project, based on Marklands it appears that Furyondy and Nyrond have been moving in degrees to tenancy with regards to their peasants. The nobility would prefer rents and free tenants have the ability to negotiate their arrangements. There are portions of both countries that are closer to serfdom, however, I think the Viscounty of the March was noted. This is not to say tenants have modern landlord-lessee relationships. There are still a variety of feudal obligations, but most are not tied to the land for life.
The Great Kingdom is still practicing serfdom per Ivid the Undying.
|
|
|
Apprentice Greytalker
Joined: Oct 29, 2018
Posts: 117
From: Salt Lake
Send private message
|
Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:46 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
Could be that the Great Kingdom of Ahlissa is practicing serfdom out of tradition than need. The Great Kingdom still is a feudalistic country. As for the other two, mayhap they sense change coming to the Flanaess. Perhaps plague?
|
|
|
Adept Greytalker
Joined: Apr 11, 2009
Posts: 386
From: New York City
Send private message
|
Sun Nov 25, 2018 3:05 pm
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
In my opinion, serfdom is the traditional Aerdian system, and the Great Kingdom uses it as a means of control. In my vision, Furyondy and Veluna moved away from it over the last couple of centuries slowly, as it was better to receive rents in kind or money than deal with serfs. Similarly, Nyrond began moving away, and may have completely ended the practice legally by reading between the lines, though I think this would have been more to get cash rents for the nobles and king than anything. The Overking did not have an efficient or largely trustworthy administration so simply calling upon his nobles for revenues was probably easier, and most of them probably saw no reason to change a system that kept them in power.
|
|
|
GreySage
Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 2790
From: South-Central Pennsylvania
Send private message
|
Mon Nov 26, 2018 8:31 am
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
EltonJ wrote: |
That is, making slaves of the farmers and have them work the land for you. |
It should be remembered that, in the real world, during medieval times, there was a REAL difference between "serfs" and "slaves." Not an imaginary one. Serfs did not equate with slaves. _________________ Mystic's web page: http://melkot.com/mysticscholar/index.html
Mystic's blog page: http://mysticscholar.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|