Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:39 pm
Holder slave raids, weak Olman, etc.
|
REPLY
QUOTE
TOP
|
|
I really don't care for the portrayal of the Holders as brutal, slavetaking conquistadors in the SB book. They do not [or should not] have the advantages that the Europeans had over the natives in the New World.
Weaponry- No guns, and the jungle isn't a place where you want to spend long hours wearing heavy armor. The protection is traded off for fatigue, heat exhuastion, and extra maintainence of equipment. Not wearing full armor leaves one open to posion blowguns, and the like. An atl-atl javelin might still be dangerous to an armored man.
Disease- What? Amedio and Hepmonaland are pretty close to the Flanaess and seem to have had a fair bit of back and forth intercourse, even migrations of peoples. I find it hard to believe there wasn't more overlap in the diesease pools. Besides, what about clerics? It just seems unlikely that there will be a big smallpox type die off
[b]
Tactics[/b]- The natives may not have as many professional soldiers, but they are presumably adept at jungle fighting. They ought to do a little better against both the Holders and the SB.
As for magic - both sides have magic, so no clear advantage there.
Why can't the Holders just trade peacefully for most of their slaves? The Amedians and Olman spend a good amount of time fighting between cities and tribes- I'm sure there are plenty of captives that can be sold into slavery.With so few real advantages , large scale raiding and conquest of the jungles seems too risky to be worth it.
Heck, the Holders may even justify the whole thing like this: ''We buy slaves the Olman might otherwise sacrfice and the Amedians would eat- how is that bad?''
|